My Twitter Telephone Commutation Amongst Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Supporters Over Marginal Revenue Enhancement Rates - Hi friends inspiration by me for you, In the article that you read this time with the title My Twitter Telephone Commutation Amongst Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Supporters Over Marginal Revenue Enhancement Rates, We have prepared this article well for you to read and retrieve information from it. hopefully fill the posts Article lainnya, we write this you can understand. Alright, happy reading.

Title : My Twitter Telephone Commutation Amongst Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Supporters Over Marginal Revenue Enhancement Rates
link : My Twitter Telephone Commutation Amongst Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Supporters Over Marginal Revenue Enhancement Rates

My Twitter Telephone Commutation Amongst Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Supporters Over Marginal Revenue Enhancement Rates

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

By Shane Kastler

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), loves to verbalize most “marginal revenue enhancement rates.” In fact, she reminds me of a teenager who merely learned a novel discussion as well as constantly industrial plant it into conversations to audio smart. All acre ridiculing anyone who disagrees alongside her.

At the outset, it should survive noted that she oftentimes uses the phrase incorrectly.


She says nosotros request to direct hold marginal taxes, but nosotros ALREADY direct hold them. What she way is that she wants HIGHER marginal revenue enhancement rates. In fact, she has floated the persuasion of a seventy per centum revenue enhancement charge per unit of measurement on incomes that travel past times $10 million. She says the authorities should seize this exorbitant charge per unit of measurement on the “tippy tops” (her words) of people's incomes. “Tax the rich” is a pop rallying yell that is certain to gain to a greater extent than or less votes from those who are accomplices as well as recipients of your thievery. But is such taxation truly beneficial to gild every bit a whole? Is it moral? Is it justified, if the plunder is used to “help the poor”? These are thorny ethical questions that divulge AOC as well as other socialists similar her, every bit the unrighteous villains that they are. I dare say, that fifty-fifty Jesus would grip alongside my assessment.

The gospel of Mark records a quote from Jesus inwards which he says this: “No 1 tin travel into the potent man’s employment solid as well as plunder his holding unless he get-go binds the potent man, as well as and then he volition plunder his house.” (Mark 3:27) To survive clear, Jesus was non addressing marginal revenue enhancement rates inwards this passage. He was speaking of spiritual matters. But the event he uses is both telling as well as true. If you lot are going to “plunder” a human being of strength, as well as then you lot must get-go “bind” the human being of strength. AOC is seeking to both bind as well as plunder inwards at to the lowest degree ii ways. First of all, she used the political organisation to acquire herself elected into a seat of extreme power. Secondly, she wishes to role this ability to direct hold coin that doesn't belong to her as well as give it to people who haven't earned it. And she makes it audio therefore pious!

In a recent tweet, she wrote, “It’s wild that to a greater extent than or less people are to a greater extent than scared of a marginal revenue enhancement charge per unit of measurement than the fact that 40% of Americans fighting to pay for at to the lowest degree 1 basic need, similar nutrient or rent. Imagine if nosotros focused positively, away from fright of the onetime toward solving the latter.” My twitter response, as well as accurate translation of what she said, was this: "Translation: It's wild that to a greater extent than or less people won't permit politicians similar me to mug them therefore nosotros tin give the proceeds to our voters. If nosotros could exclusively brand people hollo back POSITIVELY most getting mugged!"

While my reply may direct hold been mildly sarcastic, it was nonetheless true. Her vacuous logic plays therefore good alongside an ignorant as well as immoral world that sees plunder every bit their birthright. And the flat warfare that AOC engages in, past times pitting rich against poor, is a classic ploy of socialism. Demonize the industrious, therefore the mobs volition side alongside you lot inwards your thievery. It worked for Lenin, therefore why shouldn't it operate for AOC? Not to advert her vague terminology as well as questionable numbers of “40 per centum who fighting to pay....” How exercise you lot define an ambiguous discussion similar “struggle” inwards the footing of economics? And fifty-fifty if to a greater extent than or less people exercise legitimately “struggle” - Does this justify taking from others?

The unsafe business office of AOC's con game is how many people defend such actions. One “tweeter” chastised me past times tweeting, “You realize how that revenue enhancement would work? Only those who earn over $10m inwards a unmarried yr would survive affected. You would benefit, non survive harmed.”My reply was this: “Yes, I know how it works. But robbing from the rich to MAKE them hapless is no to a greater extent than noble than robbing from the hapless to KEEP them poor. It doesn't affair who benefits from thievery. It's nevertheless wrong. And how exercise you lot know I brand less than $10 million?”

This person's mindset is all besides mutual inwards our footing today. They justify thievery past times basing it on who is getting robbed, instead of considering whether or non robbery itself is moral. Socialists similar AOC, assume that if you lot direct hold money, you lot must come upwards past times it nefariously. While it's truthful that to a greater extent than or less people pocket and/or swindle their way to a fortune, what most those who truly earn it through work? The whole concept of increasing wealth through personal task as well as sacrifice is antithetical to the leech mentality of socialism, which champions taxation at exorbitant rates; therefore the political flat tin purchase votes through entitlements. And brand no mistake, a revenue enhancement charge per unit of measurement that allows the authorities to direct hold twice every bit much every bit you lot are allowed to keep, is pure thievery. Even if you lot concede the necessity of to a greater extent than or less taxation, it is impossible to justify such a gross imbalance that punishes production. An economic scheme based on this type of “Robin Hood” ethics is doomed to fail, every bit history has proven fourth dimension as well as again.

In conclusion, AOC's socialism is non exclusively dangerous, it is immoral. And it is the way the immorality is packaged that makes it therefore dangerous. She may pawn herself off every bit righteous inwards her indignation of the “rich” as well as her supposed want to “help the poor.” But if she were REALLY righteous, she powerfulness encourage the rich to give to charity, rather than using her newfound ability to fleece them.  And if her indignation were rooted inwards morality, she would oppose all forms of thievery, regardless of who is robbed or who benefits from the theft.

Shane Kastler is Pastor at the Heritage Baptist Church, Lake Charles, LA as well as Co-Host; "Church & State" KELB Radio, 100.5 FM. He blogs at The Narrow Road.

Thus the article My Twitter Telephone Commutation Amongst Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Supporters Over Marginal Revenue Enhancement Rates

That's all the article My Twitter Telephone Commutation Amongst Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Supporters Over Marginal Revenue Enhancement Rates this time, hopefully can benefit you all. okay, see you in another article posting.

You are now reading the article My Twitter Telephone Commutation Amongst Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Supporters Over Marginal Revenue Enhancement Rates with the link address https://inspirationsbymeforyou.blogspot.com/2019/04/my-twitter-telephone-commutation.html

Share this post